An employer has to show both a fair reason and a fair process. Failing on either is enough.
Conduct, capability, redundancy or some other substantial ground. The employer has to prove it. The employee does not have to prove the opposite.
Notice of the allegation, sight of the evidence, a real chance to respond, representation, and an appeal. Skipping steps is the most common way employers lose.
Even where misconduct is proven, the adjudicator asks whether a reasonable employer would have dismissed, or whether a warning would have done.
Where you resigned, the burden flips. You have to show the employer's conduct was so bad that resignation was reasonable, and usually that you tried the grievance procedure first.
Where the complaint is that you were not paid your notice or a contractual entitlement, that is a Payment of Wages or wrongful dismissal claim and runs on different rules.
Compensation for financial loss up to two years' pay, reduced if you contributed to the dismissal or did not look for work. Reinstatement and re-engagement are possible but rare.
How you were told matters. A dismissal with no meeting, no allegation and no chance to respond is very likely to be found unfair, whatever the reason.
You may still have a claim if the dismissal was for pregnancy, a protected disclosure, trade union activity or discrimination. Otherwise a contract or notice claim may be the route.
Not necessarily. If you resigned because the situation was intolerable, that may be a constructive dismissal. It is harder to prove, so tell us the full story.
Usually yes, and quickly. It shows you engaged with the process and the WRC expects it. It does not stop the six month clock, so we lodge in parallel if needed.
The WRC does not award costs, so each side bears its own. We tell you at the first meeting what our involvement will cost and whether the claim is worth running.
Your contract, the dismissal letter or message, any warnings, minutes of meetings, and a dated timeline. Rough is fine.
Make an appointment